I’d like to add to Paul’s caution to focus on the process vs. assuming bad faith of the nomcom itself. Regular reviews of the process are good and in light of the current discussions, I would expect the Board taking this fully into account. I also appreciate the support for the petition process and encourage everyone to exercise that as a way of voicing their feedback.
respectfully, -ron > On Oct 10, 2021, at 12:00 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 07:59:55 -0400 > From: Paul Andersen - ARIN <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > To: ARIN-PPML List <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] NomCom misbehavior > Message-ID: <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > > Hello PPML, > > As this discussion unfolds I thought I would make a few clarifications given > that the NomCom is formed by the Board. I understand that some members of the > community may disagree with the outcome of the NomCom?s initial slate; > however, an assertion of misbehavior suggests the NomCom acted out of scope > of their charter and mandate or acted in bad faith. > > Based on the system in place and of which the community has been aware, the > NomCom acted within its scope and performed its duties consistent with the > parameters of its charter, Board guidance, and the Bylaws. The NomCom elected > not to provide the optional explanatory statement to the candidates. The > petitioners have exercised their right to ask the membership to add their > name to the ballot. The petition process, while it is rare to be used, is > there for this very purpose. > > There are also suggestions which are being raised which I would suggest are > better raised in other forums. First the election process is underway and it > would be inappropriate for the organization to enter into any discussion > during the election process. Also, this is starting to sway out of the scope > of PPML and other avenues are available to members such as the ARIN > Consultation and Suggestion Process (?ACSP") and the November ARIN Public > Policy and Member?s Meeting. > > Having said that, the Board will note these suggestions, and as is our normal > process, add these to our annual review later this year of the election > process. We thank those that have provided such suggestions. > > As for an assertion of bad faith, that is a very serious allegation and one > that should not be made lightly. Mere disagreement with the decision of the > NomCom does not in and of itself mean there is misbehavior; so I would ask > that the community focus its feedback and comments on constructive input. If > any community member has a specific account of bad faith to relay, please > communicate that directly to me and/or ARIN?s General Counsel. > > Thank you, > > Paul Andersen > Chair, ARIN Board of Trustees > > ------------------------------
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
