> On Mar 3, 2022, at 16:25 , Scott Leibrand <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 2:20 PM Owen DeLong via ARIN-PPML <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> Replace >> >> “The source entity must be the current rights holder of the IPv4 addresses >> or ASNs recognized by the RIR responsible for the resources, and not be >> involved in any dispute as to the status of those resources.” >> >> with >> >> “The source entity must be the current rights holder of the IPv4 addresses >> or ASN recognized by the RIR responsible for the resources, and not be >> involved in any dispute as to the status of those resources.” > > I don’t see any difference in this change other than the font size. > > They're proposing to change ASNs to ASN there. > > -Scott
Ah… Not sure how I missed that in the multiple passes I made looking for it. In that case, I would suggest that the better change would be ASN(s) since there may be one or more ASN(s) being transferred. ASN would create an arguable policy limit of one ASN. The current text creates (less of) an arguable policy requirement to transfer multiple ASNs. Owen
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
