I’m fine with this as is now. However, since we’re opening this particular can of worms, I will ask the following question…
Do we want to limit the total additional allocation/assignment to MDN to be doubling the qualifying MDNs instead of the total space of the organization? As written below, for example, let’s say an org had 16 MDNs each of which held a /22. The organization’s total space would be a /18. In the event where two of the MDNs qualified to expand, in theory, they could each be expanded by an additional /19 in a single transaction (transfer a /18) vs. the more reasonable transfer of a /21 which would double each of the qualified networks by an additional /22. Owen > On Mar 17, 2022, at 05:45 , ARIN <[email protected]> wrote: > > The following Draft Policy has been revised: > > * ARIN-2022-1: MDN Clarification for Qualification > > Revised text is below and can be found at: > > https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2022_1/ > <https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2022_1/> > > You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will > evaluate the discussion to assess the conformance of this Draft Policy with > ARIN's Principles of Internet number resource policy as stated in the Policy > Development Process (PDP). Specifically, these principles are: > > * Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration > * Technically Sound > * Supported by the Community > > The PDP can be found at: > https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/pdp/ > <https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/pdp/> > > Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at: > https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/ > <https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/> > > Regards, > > Sean Hopkins > Senior Policy Analyst > American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) > > > > Draft Policy ARIN-2022-1: MDN Clarification for Qualification > > Problem Statement: > > The requirements for transfers involving companies operating multiple > discrete networks under section 8.5 of the NRPM are unclear and need > clarification. > > Policy Statement: > > Replace the first paragraph of Section 8.5.7 with the following: > > Organizations may qualify for additional IPv4 address blocks by demonstrating > 80% utilization of their currently allocated space. In organizations > operating multiple discrete networks, each discrete network may be assessed > individually for the 80% utilization threshold. To qualify under this policy, > the organization must provide justification that each network is discrete, > per the criteria described in section 4.5. Each discrete network must meet > the projection requirements in section 8.5.5, and each discrete network for > which IP addresses are requested must meet the utilization requirements in > section 8.5.6. Organizations may receive one or more transfers up to the > total size of their current ARIN IPv4 address holdings, up to a maximum size > of /16. > > Comments: None > > Timetable for implementation: Any > > > > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > <https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml> > Please contact [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you experience any > issues.
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
