In message <[email protected]>, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote:
> Are you unilaterally defining the purpose of this mailing list to only > include the _formulation_ of policy but never its associated enforcement? > > >Not at all - If you wish to discuss a policy-related enforcement issue _in >general_ (whether due to existing policy language or ARIN's implementation >of same), feel free to utilize the arin-ppml mailing list for that purpose. That's a rather clever Catch-22 you've set up there John. I could have just come here and said "I think that ARIN might not always be vigorously enforcing the policy that requires members to have a substantial connection to the region" and you would have instantly said "Ron, you have no evidence to support that." OK, so, we'll do it in the opposite order next time. I'll make a generalized claim and you'll then challenge me for a specific example and I'll present the specific evidence. I can't see how it makes much difference, one way or the other, since we end up with both the general claim and the specific example in the end either way. But if it pleases you to start with the general and then proceed to the specific, I'm OK with that. Your wish is my command. Regards, rfg P.S. I'm not sure that I ever saw from you a crisp answer to the question "How many times has ARIN enforced policy against a member in cases that (a) did not involve the non-payment of fees and that also (b) did not involve criminal fraud?" Is that number zero? _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
