In message <camdxq5mha410cgfvqext52t-bjn7zxhcz-0co2o0tlrc61p...@mail.gmail.com> Martin Hannigan <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 15:56 Ronald F. Guilmette <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> So you don't think that vetting members should be rightfully construed as >> an important matter of policy? > > >No. OK, well, you're entitled to your opinion. I would argue however that the entirety of Sections 8.2 and 9 of the NPRM are dedicated to being explicit about who gets what and under what exact conditions. Now, if I say to John "ARIN ought to have a policy to make sure organizations are validly constituted and are who they say they are" then he will say to me "OK, fine. That's a policy matter, so propose a policy." Meanwhile _you_ will say "That is a mere administrative matter, and doesn't need to be specified in a policy." Congratulations! You seem to have worked out a foolproof two-pronged strategy for insuring total inaction on anything that doesn't suit your personal tastes. A really admirable example of Catch 22. Regards, rfg _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
