I doubt this will really set any precedent. In general, the case is a fairly 
run of the mill fraud case.

IANAL, but I don’t see much about the case that would be novel or precedent 
setting.

Owen


> On Jun 7, 2023, at 06:04, Douglas Haber via ARIN-PPML <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> As a follow up to some of the discussion from July 2022, it appears to me 
> that sentencing may be imminent for Mr. Golestan and Micfo. He filed a motion 
> to withdraw his guilty claims on 26 April of this year [1].
>  
> Honorable Richard M. Gergel, US District Judge, issued a ruling [2] on that 
> motion on 15 May denying that motion on a number of grounds including that he 
> took too long and sentencing is imminent.
>  
> I, for one, am very curious to see how this plays out in terms of sentencing. 
> It certainly will set a precedent.
>  
>  
> [1] 
> https://www.postandcourier.com/behind-the-scenes/charleston-tech-executive-wants-to-withdraw-his-fraud-plea/article_f715474e-e8f8-11ed-a90f-fbd8b3174012.html
> [2] https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-golestan
>  
> -- 
> Douglas Haber
> Managing Member
> Garden State Computing, LLC
> Tel: (973) 636-7350
> www.gardenstatecomputing.com <http://www.gardenstatecomputing.com/> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you experience any 
> issues.

_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to