Hi Bill, Fair enough, most people interested in this are likely to have some conflicts and it's important to consider those.
If we unilaterally excluded all candidates with conflicts though, candidate pickings would be even slimmer. Regards, Mike ---- On Thu,26 Oct 2023 17:22:13 -0400 b...@herrin.us wrote ----On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 6:58 AM Mike Burns <m...@iptrading.com> wrote: > And I agree with Fernando that affiliations or connections to > IP brokers would be a point in their favor considering they > are the people distributing IPv4 addresses these days. Hi Mike, Before considering someone affiliated with an address broker for an ARIN position, I'd want them to demonstrate that they recognize the conflict of interest that's likely to pose and have a well conceived plan for addressing it. Conflict of interest corrupts even the best intentioned. I once quit a job I liked because despite his good intentions my boss unsuccessfully managed his conflict of interest. It placed me in a position where I couldn't properly oversee the prime vendor. So I'm sensitive to conflicts of interest. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin b...@herrin.us https://bill.herrin.us/
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
