William Herrin <[email protected]> wroteth in response to: >Owen DeLong <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> whomst’d wrote: >> Overall, I think it provides a better result, but making a public record of >> absolutely everything would be cause more problems than it would solve >> IMHO. > >I have no qualms with the AC having a safe space to candidly discuss >and debate the policy proposals. But don't blow smoke up my tail that >they're not privately discussing and debating the policy proposals. If >that were the whole truth, if the private discussion was purely >administrivia, they'd have no need for a safe space.
Bill, if you’re really interested in how the sausage is made, here’s what I tell Everybody else with that same interest: “I would encourage you to participate more in the policy discussions regarding the matters of the policies, attending meetings, speaking at the microphone, gathering community support for the policies that impact you as well as for your candidacy, and finally, and running for the AC.” It’s one thing comment from the outside looking in, but quite another to see things from the inside perspective. Don’t discount how former AC members relate their experience, because it’s a very valid and valuable point of theirs. And the AC really does welcome ALL points of view. Leif Sawyer AC Chair
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
