On 18/04/2024 21:34, Matt Peterson wrote:
<clip>
If the policy needs revision /(John's comments did not provide enough
of a background story - it's unclear if this a yet another IPv4 land
grab approach, and/or IXP's evolving into hosting content caches,
and/or the historical industry acceptable usage that Ryan shares),
/maybe consider micro-allocations for IXP usage as unannounced
prefixes and for routed prefixes, an IXP applies under NRPM 4.3 /(end
user assignments).
/
I have a similar conversation recently with someone willing to use IXP
allocations to assign to content caches and on this point I think that
IXP pool should not be for that. Even knowing the positive impact a
hosted content directly connected to a IXP makes it is their business to
being their own IP address not the IXP and to be fair if you think of
any CDN service they all have total means to do that. Therefore IXP
allocations should be used for IXP own usage, so internal Infrastructure
and to connect members and things should not be mixed up.
Regards
Fernando
--Matt
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
