> On May 26, 2024, at 09:08, Bill Woodcock <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On May 24, 2024, at 22:31, Owen DeLong <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On May 24, 2024, at 00:16, Bill Woodcock <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> On May 23, 2024, at 06:24, Martin Hannigan  wrote:
>>>> I agree that it should be a shared segment fabric
>>> I’m on the fence about this.  At first glance, yeah, that seems obvious.  
>>> But then what about all the crossconnects and VLAN-based “virtual 
>>> crossconnects?”  Those all _necessarily_ need to be numbered out of 
>>> provider space?  I agree that at large exchanges, that would consume a lot 
>>> of IP space quickly, but it’s not like it’s not getting consumed anyway, 
>>> it’s just a question of who provides it.  If the IX provides it, the 
>>> peering connection is obvious in traceroutes and to other analytical tools, 
>>> and that’s very valuable.  If one of the participants provides it, that 
>>> information is lost and has to be fuzzily inferred.
>> Every IX implementation I’m aware of that uses those still has some form of 
>> shared fabric at the core of the exchange which I think would still qualify 
>> with the proposed wording.
> 
> For new allocations, presumably.  It would be good to avoid wording which 
> would leave IXPs seeking approval for additional allocations or transfers 
> unable to justify them because they’d used some of the allocation for 
> crossconnects.

Intereseting… I had read the existing and my proposed wording as requiring that 
there be SOME physical infrastructure based fabric involved, not that 
everything be used exclusively on that.

> 
>> What we are working to avoid here is permitting “virtual IX” 
>> implementations, which are great for teaching, but don’t represent real 
>> world peering interconnects in any meaningful way.
> 
> Agreed.  Any actual lab or teaching environment can be numbered out of 1918 
> space.

Yep.

Owen


_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to