I don't think it's a dumb question at all. There are too many practical obstacles with getting a commitment to move to IPv6 (being legally binding, what if the company shifts strategy, enforcement, etc) that would preclude this as a requirement.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 3:15 PM Matthew Cowen <[email protected]> wrote: > HI all, > > I’m often told that there are no stupid questions… to that, I say, hold my > beer :) > > With this discussion about IPv4 allocations, the waiting list, and > migration to IPv6 (which, as I understand it, is still a priority), has > there been any proposal or discussion about requiring IPv4 requesters to > commit to IPv6 migration? > > I’m not thinking about 4.10, which addresses facilitating migration to > IPv6 for those starting that process. I’m thinking about something akin to > the utilisation rate clause, where allocations depend on actual/future > promised usage. Not a proposal, just a background query. > > I searched the archives and haven’t found anything quite as specific as > that, hence my question. > > One other observation. In the NRPM, it is written: > > - 4.2.1.3. Utilization Rate > - 4.2.3.4.1. Utilization > - 4.2.4.1. Utilization Percentage (80%) > - 4.3.3. Utilization Rate > - 4.3.6.1. Utilization Requirements for Additional Assignment > > 4.2.1.3. is a *statement* and all the others are *requirements*. > > Should these be clarified as Utilisation Rate for the statement and > Utilization Percentage (X %) for the requirement, or similar, i.e., > > - 4.2.1.3. Utilization Rate > - 4.2.3.4.1. Utilization Percentage (80%) > - 4.2.4.1. Utilization Percentage (80%) > - 4.3.3. Utilization Percentage (50%) > - 4.3.6.1. Utilization Percentage (80%) Requirements for Additional > Assignment ? > > Many thanks. > > — > My best/Cordialement, > > Matthew Cowen > dgtlfutures > +596 (0) 696 210 260 > Matthew Cowen | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewcowen/> > > I write a little <https://matthewcowen.org/categories/newsletter/> about > the digital world. No pressure, only if you’re interested. > > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
