Policy changes seem reasonable. The mission was to help filter out what the IX community can advise ARIN as to what are not solid requests for resources. It included national security risk.
The policy as currently re-written supports that intent and lets ARIN apply considerations that may be relevant overall while not stunting the value of IXP’s and their growth. It really can’t get any better. Warm regards, -M< On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 16:46 William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 12:17 PM Martin Hannigan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The policy gives ARIN wide discretion. > > Policies can't give ARIN discretion. To be fair and consistent with > all registrants, ARIN must understand policies to mean something close > to the broadest reasonable interpretation, and they must consistently > apply that understanding to all applicants. > > Descriptions of intent don't belong in a policy statement; they belong > in the problem statement. The policy statement should say what is or > is not, not what's intended. > > Regards, > Bill Herrin > > > -- > William Herrin > [email protected] > https://bill.herrin.us/ >
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
