On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 4:27 PM William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 2:31 PM Martin Hannigan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Today, it is clear that neither gTLDs nor sTLDs require special support > or protection within ARIN policy. ccTLD, [and] the root [do] > > Hi Martin, > > That seems fair. What do the rest of you think? Is this correct? Incorrect? > > > > clarifying that the allocations are for the ccTLD's themselves, not > their hosters would also be appropriate. > > I've been wondering about this. Do you have any language in mind? > > My thoughts have been more toward the transfer side of the equation, > making sure the addresses stay with the critical infrastructure. > Instead of relying on section 8.2, would it be reasonable to set > explicit transfer requirements? Maybe something like: > I may have changed my mind about this after digging deeper. Once you read the rest of the thread I know you will understand. > 8.7 Critical Internet Infrastructure > > Addresses allocated under section 4.4 Critical Internet Infrastructure > shall be transferred only to the subsequent operator of the critical > infrastructure. > > What do you think? > This seems like a good question for VGRS, Afilias CIRA, PCH, etc. Thanks! -M<
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
