On 2025-03-04 20:03, Reese, Gus wrote:
The current policy mandates that entities receiving transferred
resources sign a new RSA unless they have an RSA on file no older than
the last two versions. However, defining RSA versioning requirements
within the NRPM does not align with the Policy Development Process
(PDP) guidelines, as determining which RSA version is considered
current is a business decision rather than a policy matter.
This change seems reasonable.
It also gives more flexibility to ARIN / fixes some potential goofiness.
Under the current policy, if ARIN (from a business perspective) didn't
want to require a new version, this might somewhat tie their hands in
terms of updating RSA language. In the other direction, if ARIN wanted
to accelerate things, they could just cut a couple of new versions with
trivial changes.
Letting this be a business decision seems okay.
--
Richard
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
