Howdy, I didn't see any feedback on the draft policy rewriting section 6.5, so I want to step back and solicit your opinions on what ARIN's IPv6 policies should become. I'm going to ask some questions and break them into separate message threads so that they can be followed separately according to your interest.
The question for this thread is: Do you like ARIN's current IPv6 allocation _process_ for ISPs or would you prefer to see it change? I specifically mean the process ARIN has implemented, not the policy text which is a mess. Roughly speaking, ARIN's current process for granting IPv6 addresses to ISPs works like this: /32? Granted. More than a /32? Count your customers and sites, then consult the charts on page 3 of https://www.arin.net/reference/training/resources/ipv6_networkplan.pdf . Same or longer CIDR netmask? Granted. Still more? Write a network plan and offer a technical justification why you need so much IPv6 space. Draft 2026-2 changes the above so that every ISP writes a network plan with a technical justification for the number of IPv6 addresses requested, including a /32. No automatic /32 grant. No "count your customers and sites" grant. Do you like either approach? Can you describe a third approach you'd like better? Your views are respectfully requested. Regards, Bill Herrin _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
