On 2026-08-20 16:58, June Slater wrote:
2. Echoing Owen's concerns, the wording seems ambiguous. The staff
interpretation seems to have deviated into the intent and not the
actual wording - facilitating deployment within the service area is
not necessarily the same as being used within the service area.
Given how ambiguous 4.10 already is (and how it necessitates judgement
calls from ARIN staff), I'm concerned at the possibility of
introducing yet more ambiguity.
Absent data showing a need, opposed in principle. Regardless, opposed
as written.
Hi June (and cc Owen),
I agree with your concerns about the current wording as well as whether
this policy is needed in the first place.
I want to bring your attention to Draft Policy ARIN-2025-3: Change
Section 9 Out Of Region Use Minimum Criteria, which, despite the name,
will implement this proposal and more. Thus, if ARIN-2025-8 fails and
ARIN-2025-3 passes, your opposition here is for naught.
If you oppose ARIN-2025-8, then you must also oppose the current
iteration of ARIN-2025-3, as it bans out-of-region justification for
sections 4.1.8 waiting list, 4.4 micro-allocations, /and/ 4.10 IPv6
transition. It's basically ARIN-2025-8 on steroids, bundled into a
seemingly unrelated policy.
Best regards,
Quantum
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
