The RSA is a business contract between ARIN and its members; the NRPM is
a statement of community intent. I do not support this policy as
written, and would not support it unless a more general statement
addressing number resources not being property were added to section 1.
Regards,
Eric C. Landgraf
On Aug 18 18:47, E. Marie Brierley wrote:
> Hello ARIN Community,
>
> Draft Policy ARIN-2026-3, NRPM Section 6.4.1 Retirement, will be presented at
> the upcoming public policy meeting this October. In advance of the
> presentation, the advisory council is looking for feedback from the ppml on
> whether or not this policy is supported as written. If you do support this
> policy as written please reply affirmatively, and optionally include any
> reasons why. If you do not support this policy as written it is even more
> critical for us to hear from you and your reasons why so that we can convey
> those at the upcoming meeting.
>
> As a reminder, this policy is intended to retire language in 6.4.1 governing
> ownership of IPv6 addresses. The terms of IP address ownership are
> incorporated in member RSA's. There is currently no language in the NRPM
> governing the ownership of IPv4 addresses.
>
> Regards,
> E. Marie Brierley, MBA
> Founder & President Saatvik Advisors
> ARIN Advisory Council
> www.saatvikadvisors.com
> [email protected]
> 650.704.4648
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
