On 20 August 2026, the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted “ARIN-prop-352: 
Harmonize Section 1 and Section 6, Principles and Goals Statements” as Draft 
Policy. 

https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2026_4

You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will evaluate 
the discussion to assess the conformance of this draft policy with ARIN's 
Principles of Internet number resource policy as stated in the Policy 
Development Process (PDP). Specifically, these principles are:

* Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration
* Technically Sound
* Supported by the Community

The PDP can be found at:

https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/pdp/

Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at: 
https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/

Regards,

Eddie Diego
Policy Analyst
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)


Draft Policy ARIN-2026-4: Harmonize Section 1 and Section 6, Principles and 
Goals Statements

Problem Statement: 

There are two main sections of the NRPM that discuss principles and goals; one 
is found in Section 1, and the other in Section 6; similar language in Section 
4 has been previously retired. Given the history of these two sections, there 
are multiple redundancies and incongruities in their language. This proposal 
seeks to clarify the language of both sections in order to better communicate 
ARIN’s principles and goals.

This policy proposal is not intended to make meaningful changes to these goals 
and principles, but to clarify their language and remove duplication. Any 
analysis that suggests otherwise should be addressed.

Policy Statement: 

Original Text:

Principles and Goals of the American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
1.1. Registration

The principle of registration guarantees the uniqueness of Internet number 
resources. Provision of this public registry documenting Internet number 
resource allocation, reallocation, assignment, and reassignment is necessary:

to ensure uniqueness,
to provide a contact in case of operational/security problems,
to provide the transparency required to ensure that Internet number resources 
are efficiently utilized, and
to assist in IP allocation studies.
1.2. Conservation

The principle of conservation guarantees sustainability of the Internet through 
efficient utilization of unique number resources.

Due to the requirement for uniqueness, Internet number resources of each type 
are drawn from a common number space. Conservation of these common number 
spaces requires that Internet number resources be efficiently distributed to 
those organizations who have a technical need for them in support of 
operational networks.

1.3. Routability

The principle of routability guarantees that Internet number resources are 
managed in such a manner that they may be routed on the Internet in a scalable 
manner.

While routing scalability is necessary to ensure proper operation of Internet 
routing, allocation or assignment of Internet number resources by ARIN in no 
way guarantees that those addresses will be routed by any particular network 
operator.

1.4. Stewardship

The principle of stewardship guarantees the application of these principles 
when managing Internet number resources.

The fundamental purpose of Internet number stewardship is to distribute unique 
number resources to entities building and operating networks thereby 
facilitating the growth and sustainability of the Internet for the benefit of 
all.

It should be noted that the above goals may sometimes be in conflict with each 
other and with the interests of individual end-users or network operators. Care 
must be taken to ensure balance with these conflicting goals given the resource 
availability, relative size of the resource, and number resource specific 
technical dynamics, for each type of number resource.

6.3. Goals of IPv6 Address Space Management

6.3.1. Goals

IPv6 address space is a public resource that must be managed in a prudent 
manner with regards to the long-term interests of the internet. Responsible 
address space management involves balancing a set of sometimes competing goals. 
The following are the goals relevant to IPv6 address policy.

6.3.2. Uniqueness

Every assignment and/or allocation of address space must guarantee uniqueness 
worldwide. This is an absolute requirement for ensuring that every public host 
on the Internet can be uniquely identified.

6.3.3. Registration

Internet address space must be registered in a registry database accessible to 
appropriate members of the Internet community. This is necessary to ensure the 
uniqueness of each Internet address and to provide reference information for 
Internet troubleshooting at all levels, ranging from all RIRs and IRs to end 
users.

The goal of registration should be applied within the context of reasonable 
privacy considerations and applicable laws.

6.3.4. Aggregation

Wherever possible, address space should be distributed in a hierarchical 
manner, according to the topology of network infrastructure. This is necessary 
to permit the aggregation of routing information by ISPs, and to limit the 
expansion of Internet routing tables.

This goal is particularly important in IPv6 addressing, where the size of the 
total address pool creates significant implications for both internal and 
external routing.

IPv6 address policies should seek to avoid fragmentation of address ranges.

Further, RIRs should apply practices that maximize the potential for subsequent 
allocations to be made contiguous with past allocations currently held. 
However, there can be no guarantee of contiguous allocation.

6.3.5. Conservation

Although IPv6 provides an extremely large pool of address space, address 
policies should avoid unnecessarily wasteful practices. Requests for address 
space should be supported by appropriate documentation and stockpiling of 
unused addresses should be avoided.

6.3.6. Fairness

All policies and practices relating to the use of public address space should 
apply fairly and equitably to all existing and potential members of the 
Internet community, regardless of their location, nationality, size or any 
other factor.

6.3.7. Minimized Overhead

It is desirable to minimize the overhead associated with obtaining address 
space. Overhead includes the need to go back to RIRs for additional space too 
frequently, the overhead associated with managing address space that grows 
through a number of small successive incremental expansions rather than through 
fewer, but larger, expansions.

6.3.8. Conflict of Goals

The goals described above will often conflict with each other, or with the 
needs of individual IRs or end users. All IRs evaluating requests for 
allocations and assignments must make judgments, seeking to balance the needs 
of the applicant with the needs of the Internet community as a whole.

In IPv6 address policy, the goal of aggregation is considered to be the most 
important.

Proposal Text:

Principles and Goals of the American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
Update Sections 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4 as follows:

1.1. Registration (refactor of original language)

The provisioning of a public registry documenting Internet number resource 
allocation, reallocation, assignment, and reassignment is necessary:

to ensure the uniqueness of allocated resources,
to provide operational and security contacts for resource holders,
to provide the transparency required to ensure that Internet number resources 
are efficiently utilized, and
to provide data for the research and reporting of allocation activity.
1.2. Conservation (moving language from 6.3.5, integrating into existing)

Due to the requirement for uniqueness, Internet number resources of each type 
are drawn from a common number space. Conservation of these common number 
spaces requires that these resources be efficiently distributed to those 
organizations who have a technical need for them in support of operational 
networks. Requests for address space should be supported by appropriate 
documentation; stockpiling of unused addresses should be discouraged.

1.3. Routability and Scalability (moving language from 6.3.4, integrating into 
existing)

Wherever possible, address space should be distributed in a hierarchical 
manner, according to the topology of network infrastructure. This is necessary 
to permit the aggregation of routing information by ISPs, and to limit the 
expansion of Internet routing tables.

Where possible, address policies should seek to avoid fragmentation of address 
ranges.

While routing scalability is necessary to ensure proper operation of Internet 
routing, allocation or assignment of Internet number resources by ARIN in no 
way guarantees that those addresses will be routed by any particular network 
operator.

1.4. Stewardship (removing language and moving to new sections harmonized with 
original 6.3. sections)

The fundamental purpose of Internet number stewardship is to distribute unique 
number resources to entities building and operating networks thereby 
facilitating the growth and sustainability of the Internet for the benefit of 
all.

Add new sections, with language borrowed from original section 1.4 and sections 
6.3.6 and 6.3.7:

1.5 Fairness

All policies and practices relating to the use of public address space should 
apply fairly and equitably to all existing and potential members of the 
Internet community, regardless of their location, nationality, size or any 
other factor.

1.6 Conflict of Goals It should be noted that the above goals may sometimes be 
in conflict with each other and with the interests of individual end-users or 
network operators. Care must be taken to ensure balance with these conflicting 
goals given the resource availability, relative size of the resource, and 
number resource specific technical dynamics, for each type of number resource.

6.3. Goals of IPv6 Address Space Management

Update 6.3.1 to reference earlier principals and goals statements:

6.3.1. Goals

IPv6 address space, like other resources under ARIN’s purview, must be managed 
in a prudent manner in keeping with the long-term interests of the internet. 
Responsible address space management involves balancing a set of sometimes 
competing goals. In addition to the general principles and goals in Section 1, 
the following principles and goals should be followed in managing IPv6 address 
resources:

Remove 6.3.2 and 6.3.3 as redundant to 1.2 and 1.1:

6.3.2. (retired)

6.3.3. (retired)

Modify 6.3.4, moving more generic language to 1.3 while keeping IPv6-specific 
language

6.3.4. Aggregation

Wherever possible, address space should be distributed in a hierarchical 
manner, according to the topology of network infrastructure. This is necessary 
to permit the aggregation of routing information by ISPs, and to limit 
unnecessary expansion of the size of Internet routing tables.

IPv6 address policies should seek to avoid fragmentation of address ranges. 
ARIN will apply practices that maximize the potential for subsequent 
allocations to be made contiguous with past allocations currently held; 
however, there can be no guarantee of contiguous allocation.

When managing IPv6 address resources, the goal of Aggregation should be 
considered the most important.

6.3.7. Minimized Overhead

It is desirable to minimize the overhead associated with obtaining address 
space. Overhead includes the need to request additional space too frequently 
and the overhead associated with managing address space that grows through a 
number of small successive incremental expansions, rather than through fewer, 
but larger, expansions.

Remove 6.3.8 as redundant to 1.6 (which now calls out the IPv6-specific 
priority of conflicting goals)

6.3.8. (retired)

Comments
This proposal is being submitted as a work product of the ARIN Advisory Council 
Policy Experience Report Working Group (PERWG).

As stated earlier, this is intended to be solely a language cleanup and 
harmonization, and is submitted with no intention to materially change 
allocation policies. All parties should carefully review the updated language 
and call out potential changes in policy that may happen unintentionally with 
the adoption of this language.





_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to