Send arin-tech-discuss mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-tech-discuss
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of arin-tech-discuss digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Returned registrationDate format in payloads returned by
GET vs. POST (Create Recipient Customer) (Andy Newton)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 13:17:24 +0000
From: Andy Newton <[email protected]>
To: Jarl Stefansson <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [arin-tech-discuss] Returned registrationDate format in
payloads returned by GET vs. POST (Create Recipient Customer)
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Jarl Stefansson
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Sunday, December 23, 2012 11:38 PM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [arin-tech-discuss] Returned registrationDate format in payloads
returned by GET vs. POST (Create Recipient Customer)
I just wanted to ask if this was normal behaviour or possibly a bug.
When using GET to retrieve Customer information the registrationDate is in the
format 2012-10-31T12:29:32-04:00
When creating a new Customer the returned payload has the registrationDate in
the format 2012-12-23T23:23:55.400-05:00
It's easy enough to parse both formats but I just wanted to check if this might
be a bug?
--
Regards,
Jarl Stefansson
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Jarl,
Thanks for the question.
Both dates are in ISO8601 format, but each has a different timezone offset.
I've attempted to reproduce this with no success. Are you using GET on the same
customer after creating it? I ask because the registration dates in your
example do not appear to be the same. Regardless, I would expect the GET to
return an EST timezone value so this might be a bug on our end.
Regards,
Andy Newton
Chief Engineer, ARIN
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-tech-discuss/attachments/20121226/c5fe672b/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
arin-tech-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-tech-discuss
End of arin-tech-discuss Digest, Vol 23, Issue 3
************************************************
