Send arin-tech-discuss mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-tech-discuss
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of arin-tech-discuss digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Erroneous "IP range overlaps with existing network(s)."
errors (David Huberman)
2. Re: Erroneous "IP range overlaps with existing network(s)."
errors (Tim Garrison)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:24:13 +0000
From: David Huberman <[email protected]>
To: Tim Garrison <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [arin-tech-discuss] Erroneous "IP range overlaps with
existing network(s)." errors
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi Tim,
Thank you very much for your report. ARIN has corrected the issue, and all
your calls should now be working properly. The problem was an artifact of
a new software deployment performed Saturday morning. There were no
adverse affects for the data in our registration system.
Regards,
David
---
David R Huberman
Principal Technical Analyst, ARIN
703-227-9866
On 2/19/13 10:32 AM, "Tim Garrison" <[email protected]> wrote:
Greetings,
For the last 3 days, any attempt to reassign a subnet with the RESTful API
results in the following error:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<error xmlns="http://www.arin.net/regrws/core/v1";>
<additionalInfo/>
<code>E_ENTITY_VALIDATION</code>
<components>
<component>
<message>IP range overlaps with existing network(s).</message>
<name>startAddress</name>
</component>
</components>
<message>Payload entity failed to validate; see component messages for
details.</message>
</error>
The subnet in question here is 173.193.174.104/29. I have verified that
there are no other subnet registrations in the adjacent space
(173.193.174.0/25 was analyzed and found to contain
only subnets in ?Direct Allocation?.
My sample reassign payload is as follows:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<net xmlns="http://www.arin.net/regrws/core/v1";>
<version>4</version>
<comment></comment>
<netBlocks>
<netBlock>
<type>S</type>
<startAddress>173.193.174.104</startAddress>
<cidrLength>29</cidrLength>
</netBlock>
</netBlocks>
<customerHandle>C03321089</customerHandle>
<netName>NET-173-193-174-104</netName>
<parentNetHandle>NET-173-192-0-0-1</parentNetHandle>
</net>
Has anything changed recently that would be causing this error? Is there
some other underlying issue causing this?
Thanks,
Tim Garrison
Software Engineer II
[email protected]
281.714.4213 direct
713.540.4325 cell
866.398.7638 toll-free
281.714.4657 fax
SoftLayer Technologies, Inc.
315 Capitol Street
Suite 205
Houston, TX 77002
http://www.softlayer.com
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:38:32 +0000
From: Tim Garrison <[email protected]>
To: David Huberman <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [arin-tech-discuss] Erroneous "IP range overlaps with
existing network(s)." errors
Message-ID:
<1F52C37AF7BEB244A082D9BE6B0B0DFE073540F7@SM-DAG151.softlayer.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Thanks, David. That cleared the issue right up!
Tim Garrison
Software Engineer II
[email protected]
281.714.4213?? direct
713.540.4325?? cell
866.398.7638?? toll-free
281.714.4657?? fax
SoftLayer Technologies, Inc.
315 Capitol Street
Suite 205
Houston, TX 77002
http://www.softlayer.com
-----Original Message-----
From: David Huberman [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 12:24 PM
To: Tim Garrison; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [arin-tech-discuss] Erroneous "IP range overlaps with existing
network(s)." errors
Hi Tim,
Thank you very much for your report. ARIN has corrected the issue, and all your
calls should now be working properly. The problem was an artifact of a new
software deployment performed Saturday morning. There were no adverse affects
for the data in our registration system.
Regards,
David
---
David R Huberman
Principal Technical Analyst, ARIN
703-227-9866
On 2/19/13 10:32 AM, "Tim Garrison" <[email protected]> wrote:
Greetings,
For the last 3 days, any attempt to reassign a subnet with the RESTful API
results in the following error:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?> <error
xmlns="http://www.arin.net/regrws/core/v1";>
<additionalInfo/>
<code>E_ENTITY_VALIDATION</code>
<components>
<component>
<message>IP range overlaps with existing network(s).</message>
<name>startAddress</name>
</component>
</components>
<message>Payload entity failed to validate; see component messages for
details.</message> </error>
The subnet in question here is 173.193.174.104/29. I have verified that there
are no other subnet registrations in the adjacent space
(173.193.174.0/25 was analyzed and found to contain only subnets in ?Direct
Allocation?.
My sample reassign payload is as follows:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<net xmlns="http://www.arin.net/regrws/core/v1";>
<version>4</version>
<comment></comment>
<netBlocks>
<netBlock>
<type>S</type>
<startAddress>173.193.174.104</startAddress>
<cidrLength>29</cidrLength>
</netBlock>
</netBlocks>
<customerHandle>C03321089</customerHandle>
<netName>NET-173-193-174-104</netName>
<parentNetHandle>NET-173-192-0-0-1</parentNetHandle>
</net>
Has anything changed recently that would be causing this error? Is there some
other underlying issue causing this?
Thanks,
Tim Garrison
Software Engineer II
[email protected]
281.714.4213 direct
713.540.4325 cell
866.398.7638 toll-free
281.714.4657 fax
SoftLayer Technologies, Inc.
315 Capitol Street
Suite 205
Houston, TX 77002
http://www.softlayer.com
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
arin-tech-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-tech-discuss
End of arin-tech-discuss Digest, Vol 25, Issue 9
************************************************
