--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Wolfram Kahl <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 11:14:07PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> what *really* needs to be done with as many eyes on it as possible is >> to just go over both schematics and play "spot the difference". >> >> * Page 1 of the CT schematics needs to be compared to Page 5 of the >> EOMA68-A20 ones >> * Page 4 likewise needs to be compared to Page 10. >> >> http://hands.com/~lkcl/eoma/allwinner/a20/A20_Cubietruck_HW_V10_130606.pdf >> http://hands.com/~lkcl/eoma/allwinner/a20/DS113-V2.2-2014-07-24.pdf > > In what formats and where are the sources for these available? PDFs... and no. the cubietruck's board layout is proprietary. > (This question arises as secondary from the more primary question: > ``are automated eyes for this purpose feasible'', > for which I might be tempted to attempt to force a ``Yes'' answer > if I find sources in appropriate formats.) nehhhh good question but you'd be looking at installing windows 7, then installing ORCAD 16.3 and Mentor PADS 9.5... i mean i _have_ actually managed to get ORCAD running under Wine but due to a severe limitation of wine that the developers have failed to comprehend for over 10 years now the thing utterly sucks and blows at the same time gaaaaaad it's slow :) by the time you've gone through all that hassle a simple visual scan (i did one just now... 5 minutes... i'll do another one later, and again next week) is far far quicker. l. _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to [email protected]
