Well, I don't think the issue right now is whether or how it compares with other chips (we have other chips already). Of course, if it's libre competition, that's also for the good. I guess Intel peeps could be redirected to https://puri.sm/
(You can check their website as they are also trying towards RYF certified, see: https://puri.sm/road-to-fsf-ryf-endorsement-and-beyond/ ) And like academic arguments, multiple libre platforms is a good thing. (Although it will still be kinda rare in real terms even if both projects achieve it). Russell Not a real mathematician, just an applied geek On 15/08/2016, Matt Campbell <mattcampb...@pobox.com> wrote: > Of course, there's no substitute for trying an A20-based board and > finding out if it's good enough for the tasks you need to do. And Luke's > recent videos suggest that it is indeed good enough for several common > tasks. > > But I can't be the only one who's curious about how the A20 compares to > other processors, especially various x86 processors. > > This is where UnixBench (https://github.com/kdlucas/byte-unixbench) > comes in handy. It's an open-source system benchmark suite for Unix, > going back a couple of decades. Someone took the time to run UnixBench > on a variety of computers, including the A20-based Cubieboard2, and > published the results here: > > https://enchufado.com/proyectos/unixbench.html > > Of course, that doesn't factor in graphics performance, but I thought it > might still be worth sharing. > > Matt > > _______________________________________________ > arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk > http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook > Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk