On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[email protected] > wrote:
> - > > There's probably no help with them unless you can show them the useful > > FLOSS term, point out that the Open Source Definition derives from > > the Debian Free Software Guidelines (and has since been rather > > disclaimed by one of its authors). > > > > Libre guarantees slightly more than open source :) > > i know that, you know that.... but they've taken the libre definition > of the "four freedoms", transliterated it to a hardware world... and > called it OPEN HARDWARE (!!!) > > Not perfectly. In theory, really "libre" hardware should make the chip sources available too. What is classified as "open source hardware" hardly have any non-secret chips, because the definition they came up with allows that. Best regards, -- Cláudio "Patola" Sampaio MakerLinux Labs - Campinas, SP Gmail <[email protected]> - Mail EAD <[email protected]> - MakerLinux <[email protected]> - YOUTUBE <https://www.youtube.com/user/makerlinux>! Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/patolinux> - Facebook da MakerLinux <https://www.facebook.com/makerlinux> - Lattes <http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4763932Z5>
_______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to [email protected]
