And after having read some of the heat the project got on forums & mls we should be careful with the terms used to describe the "libreness" of it or it could degenerate quickly into an wikipedia editing war...
Just my 2cents On 8/27/16, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[email protected]> wrote: > --- > crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 > > > On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Muhammed Adel Afzal <[email protected]> wrote: >> Is "libre" better defined, and a better match, for EOMA-68? Better than >> "open" standard, I mean. Genuine question .. I have no idea. >> >> Wiki says "open" right now. > > i know... it doesn't say "open source" though :) > > honestly, i don't know. "libre" has a specific connotation that > requires that the "four freedoms" be applied to it. i honestly > haven't evaluated that yet. > > l. > > _______________________________________________ > arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] > http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook > Send large attachments to [email protected] -- Vincent Legoll _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to [email protected]
