Luke, I took a quick glance at the Wikipedia entry and saw what I thought was an error and I will fix the problem if you can confirm that I understand the situation correctly.
The wikipedia article says the following: """ There are two different physical profiles of EOMA68 (based around the legacy PCMCIA <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCMCIA> classifications):[2] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EOMA-68#cite_note-2> - 54 mm × 85.6 mm; 5mm variant (Type II) - 54 mm × 85.6 mm; 3.3mm variant (Type I) Type I is reserved for up to 1366x768 RGB/TTL video output; Type II is reserved for up to 1920x1080 RGB/TTL video output, on the basis that a Type I 3.3mm card may fit into a Type II 5.0mm socket but not vice versa. Thus, a module with a lower-capacity video output will physically be prevented from being used with incompatible higher-resolution devices, preventing any possible confusion about interoperability. """ However, as I understand things, the second part of the article is incorrect and should probably be as follows: """ Type II is reserved for up to 1366x768 RGB/TTL video output; Type I is reserved for up to 1920x1080 RGB/TTL video output, on the basis that a Type I 3.3mm card may fit into a Type II 5.0mm socket but not vice versa. Thus, a module with a lower-capacity video output will physically be prevented from being used with incompatible higher-resolution devices, preventing any possible confusion about interoperability. """ Please respond and let me know if I am understanding this issue correctly and if so, I'll make this correction to the article after I am back home from work for the day. I'm not sure about any other issues with the article but, when I get a chance I'll try to take a closer look at it (maybe some time tomorrow). -Mike
_______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to [email protected]
