On 01/13/2017 12:30 PM, dumblob wrote: > Also, if all the housings must support the rates of 1366x768, then I > would say it's too much.
I think it's obvious that's not what the standard says. It says that the *card* must support 1366x768. That's very different from requiring the *display* to support 1366x768. The only thing the display is required to do is support a resolution within the range the cards are required to support, so you can't have a type II housing that is only capable of displaying at 1920x1080. But having a type II housing that is only capable of displaying at 800x480 would be perfectly fine. -- Julie Marchant https://onpon4.github.io Protect your emails with GnuPG: https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk
