--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Nick Hardiman <[email protected]> wrote: > A standard that provides for two USB3.1 ports is a good thing. Isn’t it? yeah it is :) > In fact, USB3.1 availability might be unique in this small board world. well there first has to actually *be* a SoC that has USB 3.1! > I watched a long presentation where Jon Hall said he couldn’t find one > (OpenHours #32 - 96Boards discussion with Jon "maddog” Hall). mmm... not a fan of 96boards after their spectacular failure to respond publicly to my questions about their incompetence in designing the standard *without consulting anybody* big fan of jon hall though. > No idea what standard revision and chain of components is required to make > this work, so I’ve got no idea how to help here. Sorry. it's ok i just need to make a decision and document it. it'll be along the lines of "what would a typical SoC have as pinouts and how can PCB track cross-overs be minimised under the circumstances". i _should_ have placed the pins for the SStx/rx next door to each of their respective USB2 tracks... but that's not possible, now. _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to [email protected]
