On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 12:49 AM, zap <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 03/01/2017 06:58 PM, John Luke Gibson wrote: >> And, Luke mentioned inquiries being made about using RISC-V in a 100% >> open core board. That's probably a more longterm slightly optimistic > > ah okay fair enough. I was just curious if he planned to reverse > engineer ones with 8gb or more in the later future.
reverse-engineering i have come to the conclusion is a total - and criminal - waste of time and effort. by the time all features are 100% stable it's several YEARS down the line. look at how long ago the A64 was released, and the libdram code STILL HAS NOT BEEN REVERSE-ENGINEERED. it's 200 lines of code for fuck's sake. NO. read this, zap: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68/micro-desktop/updates/picking-a-processor that should give you some idea of how insane pretty much every single fabless semiconductor company really is. they're just not paying attention: every single one of them makes at least one compromise, somewhere, and because it's an *integrated* SoC there's absolutely nothing that can be done about it. so we need to be of the order of a MILLION units to be in a position to influence these people. and if you're going for a million units, you might as well get your own SoC custom-made. anyone knows of an open silicon H.264 and MPEG design that is capable of up to 1080p60 video decode, do let me know. l. _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to [email protected]
