--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Mike Leimon <[email protected]> wrote: >> Ok so basically this will allow type II cards( smaller) to fit into type >> III housings and utilize higher clocks ? > > I think the idea is a bit better than that even. I think that by default > all Type II cards must adhere/support the 5W upper thermal limit. However, > even > in a Type II slot the card may negotiate with a housing and if the housing > can support heat removal from the card to allow it to operate at a higher > (10W?) limit, then the card may then utilize a faster clock rate or > activate more cores (at that point). ha, you said exactly what needed to be said (including below) - i didn't need to reply _at all_ - thanks mike :) > >> Also from my understanding the >> type III card will be the physical form factor used for the EOMA 200 >> standard ? > > No, I think this is a misunderstanding. I'm pretty sure that the EOMA-200 > standard will have 202 pins Please see the following page for details: > > http://elinux.org/Embedded_Open_Modular_Architecture/EOMA-200 > > > > _______________________________________________ > arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] > http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook > Send large attachments to [email protected] _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to [email protected]
