On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:39 PM, Tor, the Marqueteur <[email protected]> wrote: > On 30/03/17 03:46, Vincent Legoll wrote: >>> From a wood engineering standpoint I'd be in favour of looking into this. >>> By using this method, wood movement with climate becomes negligible, >>> which makes things a good deal easier there. >> >> We're talking about plywood here, and smallish pieces, so I think the >> climate- >> induced wood movement will be negligible whatever we choose. >> Unless you sunk it. ;-) >> > Length/width, you're entirely correct, and that holds true for > significantly larger pieces than we've got here. The laptop needn't worry. > > Thickness is where we lose all plywood moisture stability with the > stacked option. 8 layers, 3mm thick = ~24mm thick, or a little less than > 1". As I posted earlier, between someone living in a desert, and someone > living in a wet tropical area, the latter may have a case almost 1/16" or > 1.5mm thicker than the desert person.
hmmm.... damnit. the screws will quickly trash the plywood if that's the case. that tells me it's going to have to be a 3d printed plywood hybrid. top bottom left right front back sides slotted into a curved corner arrangement, minimising the amount of 3d printing as much aspossible. arse. let me think about it. ideas anyone _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to [email protected]
