I'd say get EOMA68 cards to be fast first. Maybe even 64 bit octacore or
something fancy like that.
Then get the tablet out that has an EOMA68 slot. That will definitely be
popular if the specs are good display/battery wise.
If theres a laptop and theres a tablet, then there'll be proven customers for a
phone (the people who funded the other two)
On 25 April 2017 05:18:31 GMT+03:00, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:55 AM, Adam Van Ymeren <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On April 23, 2017 1:20:47 AM EDT, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> it's also why i haven't done a smart (or dumb) phone, because
>>>*without* that smaller size (due to "stacking") you simply can't make
>>>a small enough PCB for it to be socially acceptable, these days.
>>
>> I would totally buy and use a phone large enough to fit an eoma68 CPU
>card.
>
> i thought of a potential way to deal with that, and it's to allow the
>Card to stick out the side.
>
>> But there may not be wide enough appeal to get the costs down to a
>reasonable number.
>
> well that's why i want to do a smaller card (EOMA50). honestly if
>spending the time on this i would prefer to do something that stands a
>chance of a larger appeal (and would reach an acceptable crowd-funding
>threshold)
>
>l.
>
>_______________________________________________
>arm-netbook mailing list [email protected]
>http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
>Send large attachments to [email protected]
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
arm-netbook mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
Send large attachments to [email protected]
