--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Bill Kontos <[email protected]> wrote: > Where does the 40% improvement come from ? I remember watching a video from > Berkeley student where the improvement was "only" 11%. i read a paper somewhere where they'd put a RISCV64 design into silicon @ 40nm, ran it at 1.5ghz... but i have, if i am honest, a "fuzzy memory" > The kirin 960 was a complete fail on their part. They downgraded the > manufacturing node to one that has a lower frequency sweetspot but lower > cost as well... still 14nm for whatever it's worth these days. On top of > that, and especially on the gpu side they have very aggressive clock steps, > even missing the efficiency sweet spot and resulting in peak draws of up to > 10 watts. All for benchmarks on reviewing websites, most reviews just run a > benchmark once and show the result but do not test overheating. Totally not > suitable for eoma, no matter how much of a sucker for high performance I am. there's always the EOMA200 standard - one for the future (several more years into the future). l. _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to [email protected]
