On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Stefan Monnier <[email protected]> wrote: >> This is cool but a shame that they didnt contact Luke for using something >> like the a20 or wait for the rk3388 so we could have more money leverage on > > The A20 comes with only 1 SATA port (and no other fast port, like PCIe > or USB3) and it somehow saturates at 50MB/s when writing, so it's a poor > choice for a NAS in general (it's usable, but not great). The RK3388 > doesn't even have SATA so it's an even worse choice for a NAS.
yehyeh - they're not designed for server-level applications, which is great... because EOMA68 is not designed for server-level applications either :) honestly the router market being so saturated and also low-cost-focussed (and specialist) i can't really imagine there being even a *need* for a standards-driven design. i am however going to be doing an EOMA68 router again: it will be using the QCA9531. i'll start a new thread about this. l. _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to [email protected]
