On Tue, 30 May 2017 03:23:32 +0100 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <l...@lkcl.net> wrote: > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 3:41 PM, David Niklas <do...@mail.com> wrote: > > > So, how did the t-firefly group create their SOC if they could not get > > the CAD files? > > who said that they could not get the CAD files from Rockchip? nobody > said that they could not get the RK3399 CAD files from rockchip. i > certainly didn't say that they could not get the CAD files from > Rockchip. i also didn't see anyone *else* say that they could not get > the CAD files from rockchip. > > or any other source for that matter. > > it may help you to understand how they got hold of them if (and i > believe i am correct about this but it may need confirmation) you are > aware that t-firefly is a trading name (or subsidary) of the extremely > large company known as "Acer". > > Acer as you are no doubt aware created the highly-successful > mass-volume RK3288-based Chromebook. > > Acer therefore qualifies, easily, in Rockchip's Management's eyes, as > a "100k and above volumes" OEM 3rd party. > > they'd be *more* than happy to give Acer absolutely anything they want. > Ah, now it makes sense. I was originally thinking that if you could not get hold of them then they should not be able to either.
Thanks, David _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk