On Tue, 30 May 2017 03:19:57 +0100 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[email protected]> wrote: <snip> > given that 2D acceleration is already covered by fbturbo, and works > really well *and is entirely libre software*, the *need* for the 3D > engine just for basic Small-Office / Home-Office and day-to-day usage > is NOT A CONCERN. > > so does that make it clear that the evaluation process (which was > described a year ago) is not just a hard-and-fixed process? I was not here a year ago.
> now, if on the other hand this was a dedicated Games Console product, > *that would be an entirely different matter*. applying for RYF > Certification on a 3D Games Console product which has a 3D GPU which > *only works with proprietary software* would probably constitute too > much of a risk that buyers *WOULD* in fact go out of their way to > download the proprietary drivers. > > but this design *isn't being sold as a 3D Games Console*, is it? > > does that help clarify? > > l. > Yes, that's very clear, thanks. David _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to [email protected]
