On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:12 PM, zap <calmst...@posteo.de> wrote: >> because you've thought it through or yourself, weighed the balance of >> factors *you* are comfortable with, and come to your own conclusion. >> which may or may not happen to be the same.
> My bad,I was just trying to say that we should trust your 20+ years of > experience, considering your ethical standards in general, I thought > this was a good analysis. i'd be much more comfortable with you taking responsibility for your own decision-making (and rationale) not least, you can double-check mine. btw PLEASE zap, i believe i've had to tell you four or five times now, please TRIM UNNECESSARY CONTEXT. i set some rules and have one person still in moderation, i can't just arbitrarily ignore those rules. do you see what i did above? i cut out everything that wasn't relevant. PLEASE DO THE SAME. l. _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk