On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Hrvoje Lasic <las...@gmail.com> wrote:
> the case for GND around differential pairs cant hurt, maybe even can help.
> But is it better to have GND in plane below that actually is doing same
> things? If there is no clear path for signal to go back then I guess put
> GND in parallel is good but if you have clean GND below than make it
> somehow redundant. Or am I wrong? I am discussing these because most
> probably there is tight space even without GND lines...
the most amazing borad i saw was a 2-layer 5-port GbE router. man
you should have seen the diff-pairs on that. it was... beautiful.
every ethernet diffpair - bear in mind this is GbE with 5 ports - so
that's TWENTY pairs - had GND vias equally spaced an absolute specific
distance from them, absolutely regularly like clockwork every couple
what that does is make *absolutely* certain that there's no
cross-talk between the diff-pairs. with only a 5 mil GND trace
between pairs i am really pushing it, but there really isn't any
the first design (done by a superb senior engineer at wits-tech)
didn't even have the GND separation between diff-pairs, and yet
amazingly it worked. i don't feel comfortable leaving them out, but i
can't get vias in at both ends on all pairs.
arm-netbook mailing list email@example.com
Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk