On 09/23/2017 07:06 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 12:03 AM, zap <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> WILL YOU BE SEEKING FSF RYF ENDORSEMENT? >>> We will constantly keep FSF up-to-date on the hardware and software, >>> our current understanding is any non-free kernel firmware needed for >>> RF chips will not meet the RYF qualifications today >>> >>> that's right boyzngirlz, it don't. so... why are you calling your >>> company "purism", again? >>> >>> *sigh*.... >> they seem to think we believe their fairy dust will just magically take >> all the non-free blobs/firmware off. >> >> How amusing... but also annoying at the same time. > they'll manage to convince a lot of people. what particularly pisses > me off is that they could actually sell a variant *without* WIFI and > BT - at all - and get RYF Certification as a result - and the people > who then really wanted it could use the OTG port in Host Mode and plug > in an RYF-Certified ThinkPenguin TP150N (AR9271). > > nggggggh! I see your point. How are people that stupid...
:looks at the 2016 election then vomits into a bag: > > _______________________________________________ > arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] > http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook > Send large attachments to [email protected] _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to [email protected]
