> On Jul 10, 2018, at 13:37, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <l...@lkcl.net> wrote:
> interestingly the bullet-points 3 and 5 are *actuallly
> legitimate concerns*. the RISC-V Foundation is over-controlled by UCB
> Berkeley,[0] via a structure that is similar to the failed Google Project
> Ara ("it's open as long as you sign our secret agreement and don't
> publish information we don't want you to").
Are you referring to "Design Assurance"(as 3) and "Security"(as 5)?
Seems like an advertisement specifically against risc-v by and for ARM.
I'm sorry to hear about those terms on a project with any pretensions of being
"open".
Notes:
[0] UCB stands for "University of California at Berkeley" so the intermediate
form is normally "UC Berkeley".
_______________________________________________
arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk
http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk
