> On Jul 10, 2018, at 13:37, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[email protected]> wrote: > interestingly the bullet-points 3 and 5 are *actuallly > legitimate concerns*. the RISC-V Foundation is over-controlled by UCB > Berkeley,[0] via a structure that is similar to the failed Google Project > Ara ("it's open as long as you sign our secret agreement and don't > publish information we don't want you to").
Are you referring to "Design Assurance"(as 3) and "Security"(as 5)? Seems like an advertisement specifically against risc-v by and for ARM. I'm sorry to hear about those terms on a project with any pretensions of being "open". Notes: [0] UCB stands for "University of California at Berkeley" so the intermediate form is normally "UC Berkeley". _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to [email protected]
