On 12/09/2018 12:07 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 7:54 PM zap <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Any plans to use rk3399 for a 2nd revision of the eoma68 standard? or >> any alternative arm processor? Since risc-v is maybe 3+ years out of the >> way? > yes. bear in mind it's around USD $5k-10k per design effort. i > *may* be able to recover the RK3288 PCB i did. the RK3399 would be > nicer. My bad for responding to you directly and now too, but yeah, I think RK3399 would be better for meltdown spectre protection, etc...
Also, it is faster :) > l. > > _______________________________________________ > arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] > http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook > Send large attachments to [email protected] _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to [email protected]
