On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Dan Horák <[email protected]> wrote: > Chris Tyler píše v Po 28. 02. 2011 v 08:11 -0500: >> On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 12:17 +0000, Gordan Bobic wrote: >> > Dan Horák wrote: >> > Standard kernels and bootloaders are something that will need to be >> > looked at sooner or later, though. It might be an idea to start looking >> > at what standard supported options might include. The most popular ones >> > I can think of are (in no particular order): >> > >> > SheevaPlugs (uboot, kirkwood) >> > BeagleBoard/PandaBoard (uboot, OMAP) >> > Genesi (uboot, Freescale) >> >> We'll also want: >> >> +OLPC XO 1.75 (openfirmware, Marvell Amanda 610) > > summarized at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Team_and_Developers#Architectures
Cool, nice starting point. I have added myself for BeagleBoard interest. I guess that the nicest way to create a kernel package, would be a similar solution to the kernel.i686 and kernel-PAE.i686 as it was in Fedora-12. They came from the same srpm. Alternatively it would be possible to have different srpms to provide the different boards, but I expect that this will cost more overhead in providing updates. Any thoughts? Niels _______________________________________________ arm mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
