On 02/27/2012 02:25 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
[snip]
I wanted to get others thoughs before i went and made the change
Just to be clear, these two systems are the same machines:
hsv-trimslice-9-v5tel N N 0.0/2.0 arm -
hsv-trimslice-9-v7hl Y N 2.0/2.0 armhfp
2012-02-27 22:04:45
We just provision them as v5 or v7 according to what it looks like is
needed. That's the idea anyway- we aren't doing enough builds at once
that we've had to balance anything.
FYI, the HSV pandas also have dedicated sata disks on them and are
roughly the performance equivalent of the trimslices because of it. The
actual tally of heavybuilders (defined as having dedicated usb-sata
storage) is:
hsv-panda-1-v5tel
hsv-panda-2-v5tel
hsv-panda-3-v5tel
hsv-panda-5-v5tel
hsv-panda-6-v5tel
hsv-panda-8-v5tel
cdot-trimslice-13-1
cdot-trimslice-14-1-v7hl
hsv-trimslice-10-{v5tel,v7hl}
hsv-trimslice-9-{v5tel,v7hl}
hsv-trimslice-8-{v5tel,v7hl}
hsv-trimslice-7-{v5tel,v7hl}
hsv-trimslice-6-{v5tel,v7hl}
We can make all the HSV trimslices into v7 builders and that will give
us a 6/6 split, which seems reasonable.
--
Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / [email protected]
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
