Does that mean that we will remove the following machines from the heavybuilder channel or leave those as is?
cdot-panda-10-1-v7hl cdot-panda-10-4-v7hl cdot-panda-10-5 cdot-panda-11-4-v7hl cdot-panda-12-3 cdot-panda-5-3 cdot-panda-5-4 Thanks Masihul Max Abed Seneca CDOT On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Brendan Conoboy <[email protected]> wrote: > On 02/27/2012 02:25 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > [snip] > > I wanted to get others thoughs before i went and made the change >> > > Just to be clear, these two systems are the same machines: > > hsv-trimslice-9-v5tel N N 0.0/2.0 arm - > hsv-trimslice-9-v7hl Y N 2.0/2.0 armhfp 2012-02-27 22:04:45 > > We just provision them as v5 or v7 according to what it looks like is > needed. That's the idea anyway- we aren't doing enough builds at once that > we've had to balance anything. > > FYI, the HSV pandas also have dedicated sata disks on them and are roughly > the performance equivalent of the trimslices because of it. The actual > tally of heavybuilders (defined as having dedicated usb-sata storage) is: > > hsv-panda-1-v5tel > hsv-panda-2-v5tel > hsv-panda-3-v5tel > hsv-panda-5-v5tel > hsv-panda-6-v5tel > hsv-panda-8-v5tel > cdot-trimslice-13-1 > cdot-trimslice-14-1-v7hl > hsv-trimslice-10-{v5tel,v7hl} > hsv-trimslice-9-{v5tel,v7hl} > hsv-trimslice-8-{v5tel,v7hl} > hsv-trimslice-7-{v5tel,v7hl} > hsv-trimslice-6-{v5tel,v7hl} > > We can make all the HSV trimslices into v7 builders and that will give us > a 6/6 split, which seems reasonable. > > -- > Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / [email protected] > > ______________________________**_________________ > arm mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/arm<https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm> >
_______________________________________________ arm mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
