OK, so I've fixed webrtc/modules/audio_processing/aec. I'll post patches when complete. On to other bits of webrtc. It's all the same problem, use of SSE2, so far. Rather than clutter this email list, I've (re-started) blogging at http://davidrusling.livejournal.com/
Dave On 4 Dec 2012, at 21:35, Tom Callaway <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/04/2012 12:28 PM, David Rusling wrote: >> All, >> I'll probably blog this, but I've been doing a little bit of playing >> trying to get the Chrome web browser built on F17. The x86 source rpms >> can be found at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Chromium. The list of >> packages is: > > These are my packages, fwiw. :) > >> Attempting to build these (so far): >> >> * jsoncpp - built, no modifications >> * v8 - missing dependencies >> o readline-devel is needed by v8-1:3.11.10.20-1.fc17.armv7hl >> o libicu-devel is needed by v8-1:3.11.10.20-1.fc17.armv7hl >> o builds after missing dependencies sorted >> * webrt >> o lots of missing dependencies, easy to fix with "yum install" >> o Compiles a lot then gives up with "error: unrecognized command >> line option '-msse2'" gcc option. As this is an x86 compiler >> flag, should be easy to track down and remove. > > Might need a bit more than that, iirc. Google loves to do arm specific > versons of code. > >> * nacl-binutils- Architecture is not included: armv7hl >> o I'll try adding support for armv7hl into the spec file and see >> what happens next > > Should work. You'll need the other nacl bits too. > >> * chromium - >> * >> o Architecture is not included: armv7hl >> + chromium.spec includes the line "ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} >> arm x86_64" >> + Fixed this (by adding "armv7hl" to the list of architectures >> and it then fails because of build dependencies > > Yeah. I'm not sure if that is sufficient to make it build or not. I'd be > willing to help out there, although, I don't have access to a good arm > build env right now. > >> * chromium-ffmepegsumo >> o Missing ARM directories - the solution may be to use the >> 'standard' ffmpeg library, but may miss some things > > I wouldn't do that. It probably won't work. It should be easy enough to > add in the ARM bits. I just never bothered since it takes long enough to > make those packages as-is. > > ~tom > > == > Fedora Project
_______________________________________________ arm mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
