Hello..
we are using linux kernel 2.6.14 for our project.we need to upgrdae
this..could help in this regard.
Regards,
D.SREEDEVI,
Technical Manager,
SSD,R&D.
ECIL.
-- Original Message --
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 16:06:07 +0000
Subject: arm Digest, Vol 78, Issue 15
Send arm mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
visit
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
or, via email, send a message with subject or body
'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is
more specific
than "Re: Contents of arm digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Pandaboard kernel 3.12.7 (Sid Boyce)
2. Re: Pandaboard kernel 3.12.7 (Peter Robinson)
3. Re: Pandaboard kernel 3.12.7 (Sid Boyce)
4. Re: system with FXS port (Omalley_s)
5. Re: system with FXS port (Peter Robinson)
6. Re: BeagleBone Black CPU speed (Robert Nelson)
7. Re: system with FXS port (Robert Moskowitz)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:31:03 +0000
From: Sid Boyce <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [fedora-arm] Pandaboard kernel 3.12.7
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
format=flowed
I am currently running this kernel # uname -r
3.9.5-301.fc19.armv7hl
I blocked upgrading of the kernel as it caused a
non-booting system.
kernel headers 3.12.7-300.fc20 have been installed.
Is it now safe to upgrade the kernel to 3.12.7?
Regards
Sid.
--
Sid Boyce ... Hamradio License G3VBV, Licensed Private
Pilot
Emeritus IBM/Amdahl Mainframes and Sun/Fujitsu Servers
Tech Support
Senior Staff Specialist, Cricket Coach
Microsoft Windows Free Zone - Linux used for all
Computing Tasks
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:35:59 +0000
From: Peter Robinson <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] Pandaboard kernel 3.12.7
Message-ID:
<calede9n8x3y758sxhj_srehyqqe4hh+5_bysa3uki-vynwb...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Sid Boyce
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I am currently running this kernel # uname -r
> 3.9.5-301.fc19.armv7hl
>
> I blocked upgrading of the kernel as it caused a
non-booting system.
>
> kernel headers 3.12.7-300.fc20 have been installed.
>
> Is it now safe to upgrade the kernel to 3.12.7?
Not that I'm aware of.
Peter
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 15:06:09 +0000
From: Sid Boyce <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] Pandaboard kernel 3.12.7
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
format=flowed
On 17/01/14 14:35, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Sid Boyce
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> I am currently running this kernel # uname -r
>> 3.9.5-301.fc19.armv7hl
>>
>> I blocked upgrading of the kernel as it caused a
non-booting system.
>>
>> kernel headers 3.12.7-300.fc20 have been installed.
>>
>> Is it now safe to upgrade the kernel to 3.12.7?
> Not that I'm aware of.
>
> Peter
>
Thanks Peter,
The last I saw on 8th. November after I experienced a
non-booting system
when the kernel was updated:-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: It uses the old F19 kernel as the new F20 kernel
doesn't boot
on Panda -> do not update the kernel.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Jaromir.
--------------------------------------------------------
Regards
Sid.
--
Sid Boyce ... Hamradio License G3VBV, Licensed Private
Pilot
Emeritus IBM/Amdahl Mainframes and Sun/Fujitsu Servers
Tech Support
Senior Staff Specialist, Cricket Coach
Microsoft Windows Free Zone - Linux used for all
Computing Tasks
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:07:15 -0500
From: Omalley_s <[email protected]>
To: Robert Moskowitz <[email protected]>, "Jared K.
Smith"
<[email protected]>
Cc: arm <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] system with FXS port
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
The mirabox and d3 both have mini pci slots, but I
don't think either are supported by fedora. Getting it to work might not be
that bad depending on what they did with the bootloader.
I am guessing that if you have a kernel driver for your
pci card for x86, it should be able to be compiled into the arm kernel without
a lot of fuss.
I would love one to try.
Robert Moskowitz <[email protected]> wrote:
On 01/14/2014 03:52 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Robert Moskowitz
<[email protected]> wrote:
I am looking for a arm board, supported by Fedora, with
an FXS port to work with Asterisk.
I'm not aware of anything out there at this time. I
have heard of people using a mini-pcie to pcie bridge to use a standard PCI-E
FXS card, but that seems to me to be overkill.
I am not finding ANY usb-fxs dongles out there. Just
the openusbfxs project which is rather stagnant.
Which arm boards have mini-pci? At least I have a pci
fxs card, if I have to go that way, but I would first shop around for a
mini-pci fxs card.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/arm/attachments/20140117/524fd520/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 15:12:33 +0000
From: Peter Robinson <[email protected]>
To: Omalley_s <[email protected]>
Cc: arm <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] system with FXS port
Message-ID:
<calede9ponjnlw6f8ujc7bb616ywydm-n7awpw3kmtp6kwff...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Omalley_s
<[email protected]> wrote:
> The mirabox and d3 both have mini pci slots, but I
don't think either are
> supported by fedora. Getting it to work might not be
that bad depending on
> what they did with the bootloader.
>
> I am guessing that if you have a kernel driver for
your pci card for x86, it
> should be able to be compiled into the arm kernel
without a lot of fuss.
>
> I would love one to try.
People have got the Mirabox to work with Fedora using
our default
kernel. The issue is that because the supplied uboot
doesn't support
DT you've got to faff about with appending it and we
don't support
that OOTB although in and of itself it's not hard to do.
Peter
>
>
>
> On 01/14/2014 03:52 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Robert Moskowitz
<[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> I am looking for a arm board, supported by Fedora,
with an FXS port to
>> work with Asterisk.
>
>
> I'm not aware of anything out there at this time. I
have heard of people
> using a mini-pcie to pcie bridge to use a standard
PCI-E FXS card, but that
> seems to me to be overkill.
>
>
> I am not finding ANY usb-fxs dongles out there. Just
the openusbfxs project
> which is rather stagnant.
>
> Which arm boards have mini-pci? At least I have a pci
fxs card, if I have
> to go that way, but I would first shop around for a
mini-pci fxs card.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> arm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 09:19:46 -0600
From: Robert Nelson <[email protected]>
To: Peter Robinson <[email protected]>
Cc: Fedora ARM secondary architecture list
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] BeagleBone Black CPU speed
Message-ID:
<caochtyic_ymwgoqgu0gqnga4mxmgg8-mwj0kxg27_s6szhk...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Peter Robinson
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Robert Nelson
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Steve Underwood
<[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It looks like the BeagleBone Black is still running
at 550MHz with the
>>> latest Fedora 20. Does anyone know what is holding
it back from running at
>>> 1GHz? Is the a uboot thing, or a kernel thing, or
something else? I saw a
>>> version of uboot referred to as making the BBB run
at 1GHz, but when I tried
>>> experimenting with that I got the same 550MHz clock
speed.
>>
>> with v3.12.x:
>> These 5 patches are needed:
>>
https://github.com/RobertCNelson/linux-dev/tree/am33x-v3.12/patches/cpufreq
>>
>> or with v3.13-rcX:
>>
https://github.com/RobertCNelson/linux-dev/blob/am33x-v3.13/patches/dts/0002-arm-dts-am335x-boneblack-add-cpu0-opp-points.patch
>
> I've enabled the generic cpufreq support, we had it
disabled as when
> it first landed it had problems.
>
> The BBB is booting with 3.13rc8 with no patches but
there's a few
> issues I need to resolve this week with USB so I'll
review that for
> the BB patchset to make sure it's there. Is it queued
to go upstream
> for 3.14?
3.14 is closed, I'm cleaning my patches listed in that
repo and
planning to post to l-a/l-o after v3.14-rc1 hits..
Talking with CircuitCo, they would prefer the default
pinmux to be
setup like so:
http://elinux.org/Basic_Proto_Cape
So i'm adding those changes to the push too..
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:05:52 -0500
From: Robert Moskowitz <[email protected]>
To: Omalley_s <[email protected]>, "Jared K.
Smith"
<[email protected]>
Cc: arm <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] system with FXS port
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1";
Format="flowed"
On 01/17/2014 10:07 AM, Omalley_s wrote:
> The mirabox and d3 both have mini pci slots, but I
don't think either
> are supported by fedora. Getting it to work might not
be that bad
> depending on what they did with the bootloader.
>
> I am guessing that if you have a kernel driver for
your pci card for
> x86, it should be able to be compiled into the arm
kernel without a
> lot of fuss.
>
> I would love one to try.
I was reminded that with spandsp, you can get a
v32modem to function as
an fxs port. Of course this puts the burden for i/o
handling on your
cpu. Use to do this lots of years ago, and really
forgot those days.
You do have to watch out for how disk i/o could
interupt the modem handling.
I am hoping with a duo-core arm, like the cubie2 or
truck and a smallish
SSD drive (what do I need for storage anyway?), I can
get this working
with a usb modem. Will also test out the cisco SPA-112
which is supose
to have all the functionality I need.
This is now slotted as a feb/mar project.
thanks all for the advice. Though a 'real' fxs for an
arm board would
be the makings of a real home pbx solution.
>
>
>
> Robert Moskowitz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 01/14/2014 03:52 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Robert Moskowitz
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
>>
>> I am looking for a arm board, supported by Fedora,
with an FXS
>> port to work with Asterisk.
>>
>>
>> I'm not aware of anything out there at this time. I
have heard of
>> people using a mini-pcie to pcie bridge to use a
standard PCI-E FXS
>> card, but that seems to me to be overkill.
>
> I am not finding ANY usb-fxs dongles out there. Just
the openusbfxs
> project which is rather stagnant.
>
> Which arm boards have mini-pci? At least I have a pci
fxs card, if I
> have to go that way, but I would first shop around
for a mini-pci fxs
> card.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/arm/attachments/20140117/59054d71/attachment.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
End of arm Digest, Vol 78, Issue 15
***********************************
::DISCLAIMER::
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are
confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only.
It shall not attach any liability on the originator or
ECIL or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in
this email are solely those of the author and may not
necessarily reflect the opinions of ECIL or its affiliates.
Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying,
disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of
this message without the prior written consent of the
author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this email in error please delete it and
notify the sender immediately. Before opening any mail and
attachments please check them for viruses and defect.
THIS MAIL IS SCANNED BY ECIL IMSS FOR VIRUS AND SPAMS.
::DISCLAIMER::
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended
for the named recipient(s) only.
It shall not attach any liability on the originator or ECIL or its affiliates.
Any views or opinions presented in
this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the
opinions of ECIL or its affiliates.
Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification,
distribution and / or publication of
this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is
strictly prohibited. If you have
received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender
immediately. Before opening any mail and
attachments please check them for viruses and defect.
THIS MAIL IS SCANNED BY ECIL IMSS FOR VIRUS AND SPAMS.
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
