> -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Moskowitz [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:16 PM > To: Timothy Krantz; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] FW: Simple routing device advice (mildly OT) > > > On 07/22/2014 01:06 PM, Timothy Krantz wrote: > > Oops forgot to send to the list > > > > > > > > From: Timothy Krantz [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 10:03 AM > > To: 'Pete Travis' > > Subject: RE: [fedora-arm] Simple routing device advice (mildly OT) > > > > > > > > Hello Fedora ARM hackers, > > > > I'm shopping around for a device to provide basic routing and firewall > functions. > > > > The goal is to provide remote access to an IP camera through satellite > internet connection. To keep the camera and link from getting buried or > abused, I want to limit access to connections from a particular /25. If using > a > dynamic IP, the satellite modem uses NAT and does not offer firewall or port > forwarding capability. If using a static IP, a public IP is routed directly > to the > inside device, without a firewall. > > > > I'm thinking a small multipurpose ARM device would be a cost effective > solution. Any problems that can't be resolved via ssh will be dealt with by > post or remote hands, so it must be fairly reliable, not require user > intervention to survive power cycles, etc. I'd like a dual Ethernet device, > but > a USB nic could do. There will need to be a case or finished chassis of some > sort, preferably one that could protect that second NIC from accidental > disconnection or tampering. > > > > Is there anything on the market that fits the bill, or am I better off with > some OpenWRT supported consumer router, or maybe something else? > > > > --Pete > > > > > > > > You might want to take a look at the Dreamplug or Mirabox from > globalscale. They both have dual Ethernet and cases. I use both for exactly > the reasons you want. I have run fedora on both but currently run slackware > on both for reasons clear only to me. > > Both these and the freescale boxes are out of my price range. So I am > sticking with the Cubieboard and adding the USB ethernet. > > I MIGHT be willing to pay that price if it had 1+4 ethernet to make it a > router. >
I believe the OP mentioned that he wanted a "case" or enclosure. I was not aware that the cubieboard had one available. Tim _______________________________________________ arm mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
