----- Original Message -----
> From: Richard W.M. Jones <[email protected]>
> To: Jon Masters <[email protected]>
> Cc: Fedora ARM secondary architecture list <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 1:14 PM
> Subject: [fedora-arm] Re: 96Boards Enterprise Edition Cello
> 
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 07:18:23AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
>>  Hi Folks,
>> 
>>  I wanted to just drop a quick note that we're making *great* progress
>>  toward having early 96Boards "Cello" boards for Fedora enablement
>>  purposes. These are (AArch64) AMD Seattle based boards:
>> 
>>  http://www.lenovator.com/product/103.html
>> 
>>  These are SBSA/SBBR compliant boards that (from a software point of
>>  view) look just like ARM servers. They're also low-ish cost (for a
>>  server - $300+the cost of RAM and disk, etc.). Yes, they're not in a
>>  standard ATX form factor. We know this. Before you rant about that,
>>  consider that the goal here is to give developers a tiny board on their
>>  desk that happens to meet the software requirements for server - we all
>>  hope there will be many more server platforms that are ATX size soon.
>> 
>>  We ought to be in a very solid position to be able to support these
>>  quickly in Fedora. I've got plans in place to get some early boards to
>>  key folks needed to make that happen. I've also previously booted 
> Fedora
>>  on an early board with a couple of tweaks that need cleanup. I'll
>>  followup with details, and with the individuals who are getting early
>>  boards (they know who they are) to help get this moving.
> 
> This is good news, especially that they are non-junk SBSA/SBBR-
> compliant boards[1].
> 
> I ordered one of these the day they were announced.  Any idea when
> they'll be delivered :-?

> 

I think these are great!! It is what I have been waiting to see. I put one on 
my wishlist. It will be a while.. Hopefully, we get some good reports in the 
meantime! :) 

Sean 
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]

Reply via email to