> -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Robinson [mailto:pbrobin...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 10:50 AM > To: Timothy Krantz <tkra...@stahurabrenner.com> > Cc: arm@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] Re: Jetson TK1 and kernel 4.8 > > >> >> >> > > > > Mine has as of yet failed to boot on any of them. > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > Mine is currently running 4.8.1-1.fc25 without issues, > >> >> >> > > > just upgrading it to the latest now to test that too. > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > Was running 4.8.2-300.fc25.armv7hl+lpae, upgraded to > >> >> >> > > 4.8.4-301.fc25 without any issues. Could you post output of > >> >> >> > > your > >> >> failure? > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > Paul > >> >> >> > >> >> >> You might have better luck with a more recent version of U-Boot. > >> >> >> I'm running U-Boot 2016.11-rc2 with 4.8.4-301.fc25 on sata. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > That made sense to me so I upgraded to the uboot that you are > >> >> > using but > >> >> same problem. > >> >> > >> >> Do you have any extra peripherals added like a mPCIe card, camera > >> >> or other such things or is it just the base board? What device do > >> >> you have the rootfs on? eMMC, SD or SATA? > >> >> > >> >> I have mine running as a bare device with the OS on the eMMC, I > >> >> think Paul might have the OS on a sata SSD. Just trying to work > >> >> out what if any differences there are here as there's not much that can > be different. > >> >> > >> > > >> > Thanks Peter! > >> > > >> > Mine is yet another variation. It is a bare board with the boot > >> > partition on an > >> SD card and the root filesystem on an SSD. I left the original eMMC > >> untouched until I upgraded the uBoot. > >> > >> The u-boot is on SPI nand not the eMMC so I suspect then you didn't > >> even touch it. > >> > >> > The only thing other than the SDcard and the SSD is the serial console. > >> > > >> > Just for kicks I tried an LPAE kernel and the first time I booted > >> > it got some > >> kenel oops that I had not seen before but I was not logging the > >> console output so I turned on capture and tried again but have not > >> seen that kernel oops since. > >> > > >> > For some reason my board is not seeing the sata controller (or not > >> > getting it > >> initialized properly) on 4.7 and 4.8 kernels but does on 4.6.7. > >> > >> Is it pulled into the initrd? Do you see the driver with a "lsinitrd | grep > ahci" > >> > >> > Tim Krantz > >> > > > > > Well when booting fails with 4.8.4-lape it finally drops into a Dracut > > command prompt with no lsinitrd > > No, do it when booted against a 4.6.x kernel, you can specify the actual > initrd > on the cmd line.... > > > But all I see in to console logs is about a half dozen of : > > > > tegra-ahci 70027000.sata: couldn't get PHY in node sata: -517 > > Looks like it's not getting either appropriate power to the controller or some > module deps are failing to be pulled into the initrd correctly. > > > and that is the only reference to ahci > > > > In a good boot on 4.6.7 I do see the driver loaded with lsinitrd | grep > > ahci. > >
I apologize for my ignorance. I think what you are asking is if I run the 4.6.7 kernel with the 4.8.x initrd what do I see related to ahci. I tried that and get the same issue of not seeing sata and eventually dropping into a Dracut command prompt. Ihave been looking into how I can examine the uInitrd and saw something about stripping off the first 64 bytes, gunzipping it and mouting it as a loop device but have as yet been unable to get that work. Tim _______________________________________________ arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
