On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 3:37 PM, Ed Gasiorowski <[email protected]> wrote: > Description of problem: in RHEL 7.3, 7.4, and 7.5-SNAP1 using the following > Beaker Kickstart Metadata > > ignoredisk=--only-use=/dev/disk/by-path/platform-APMC0D33:01-ata-1.0 > "clearpart=--initlabel --all" zerombr > > On Fedora 27, anaconda fails with the following message: > http://beaker-controller.rack151.mustanglab.us.amcc/beaker/anamon > <http://beaker-controller.rack151.mustanglab.us.amcc/beaker/anamon> > + curl --retry 20 --remote-time -o /tmp/anamon > http://beaker-controller.rack151.mustanglab.us.amcc/beaker/anamon > <http://beaker-controller.rack151.mustanglab.us.amcc/beaker/anamon> > % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current > Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- > 0 100 8741 100 8741 0 0 8741 0 0:00:01 --:--:-- 0:00:01 > 2134k > + python /tmp/anamon --recipe-id 28293 --xmlrpc-url > http://beaker-controller.rack151.mustanglab.us.amcc:8000/RPC2 > <http://beaker-controller.rack151.mustanglab.us.amcc:8000/RPC2> > /tmp/ks-script-6olvntfg: line 38: python: command not found > An error occurred during reading the kickstart file: The following problem > occurred on line 32 of the kickstart file: > Disk "/dev/disk/by-path/platform-APMC0D33:01-ata-1.0" given in ignoredisk > command does not exist. > The installer will now terminate. Pane is dead > > Issue: In RHEL 7.3/7.4/7.5 & CentOS 7.3/7.4, in /dev/disk/by-path/... > the path name "platform-APMC0D33:01-ata-1.0" has decimal extension i.e. "1.0" > > In Fedora 27, in /dev/disk/by-path/... > the path name "platform-APMC0D33:01-ata-1" has no decimal extension i.e. "1" > > When using disk specific targeting for OS install on systems with more than 1 > installable device, this inconsistency causes issues with automation and > common kickstart
Looking at a booted mustang system I don't see those names but see the following: platform-1a400000.sata-ata-1 platform-1a400000.sata-ata-2 I don't see anything with platform-APM at all. So I suspect something has changed in the upstream kernel, or more likely that RHEL is pulling in non upstream patches. Do the RHEL systems have duplicate names like the above, which would actually be more consistent across systems that aren't APM anyway, that could be used. Ultimately Fedora just uses upstream, if Red Hat pulls in various non upstream patch sets that provide non standard naming there's not much we can do to address that in Fedora. Peter _______________________________________________ arm mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
