That makes sense. I noticed with distro-sync that the "getdns-stubby" package had vanished and needed to be reinstalled. But I prefer distro-sync for it seems a cleaner installation. Thanks for all the help!
On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 4:22 PM Peter Robinson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 1:37 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > "dnf --releasever=30 --setopt=deltarpm=false distro-sync" does the > trick. I wonder, if it could replace "sudo dnf -y system-upgrade download > --releasever=30" or just complete it. > > distro-sync is an alternative to system-upgrade, there's pros and cons > to it though so the later tends to be more suitable for most users. > The former is useful to ensure you have the latest packages plus and > changes like new package additions that may not get pulled in, or just > as a cleanup mechanism like this. > > Peter > > > [pi@raspi ~]$ lsb_release -d;uname -r > > Description: Fedora release 30 (Thirty) > > 5.0.10-300.fc30.aarch64 > > > > On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 10:30 PM Peter Robinson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 9:28 PM Peter Robinson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > See below. Interestingly "sudo grub2-mkconfig" resulted in > permission denied but "su" worked. Nevertheless, I am stilled faced w/ > >> > > >> > Well there's no F-30 kernels installed so it's booted as expected, > >> > even if it's not what's desired! > >> > > >> > I would: > >> > "rm -rf /var/cache/dnf/*" > >> > "dnf upgrade --refresh" > >> > >> And if that doesn't give you a new kernel update try: > >> > >> "dnf --releasever=30 --setopt=deltarpm=false distro-sync" >
_______________________________________________ arm mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
